|
January 16,
2002 |
|
DELUSION REVISITED |
|
Re.:“Are we really right?” |
|
M. Filli A. In an article titled “Are we
really right?”, the author quotes
following OAU resolution of 1964: "Solemnly declares that all Member States pledge
themselves to respect the borders existing on their achievement of national
independence.” "-- OAU - Cairo Resolution AHG/RES 16(1) and then infers “For most African countries, "the borders existing on their
achievement of national independence" are the same as their colonial
boundaries, because they achieved independence from their European
colonisers. This is not the case with Eritrea.” Therein lies
the fallacy. That the borders at national
independence are the same as their colonial boundries is true for Eritrea
too. But not because they achieved independence from their European or
for that matter non-European Colonizers but because the colonial borders
were determined and established when the Nation States/Colonies were first
created – The era of the infamous “Scramble for Africa” Those being the facts, the essence of the above
cited OAU resolution, among other things, was to prevent re-negotiating
colonial borders and to maintain colonial borders as set by the respective
colonial powers during the colonial era. Further, the author claims “Our formally recognised national
independence did not come until 1993 and it was not from Italy (who's borders
we want recognised), it was from Ethiopia.” Well, Great
Britain, and Ethiopia, all inherited exactly the same colonial borders that
has created and established Eritrea’s Nationhood by the Italians. Thus, our
colonial borders remain the same regardless of who the last colonial power
was and the date of our independence. The colonial question in Africa was resolved
when most African colonies gained national independence from their
respective colonial creators. That applies unambiguously to Eritrea as well. Eritrea
was created by Italy. Ethiopia did not create but illegally annexed and
perpetuated colonial occupation of our country only to prevent our national
independence. In 1991 the Ethiopian colonial occupation was crushed and
Eritrea became independent by the sheer power of military force. What took place1993 was designed to bring
closure to Eritrean colonial question and a matter of mere diplomatic
formality to ascertain our national independence officially as a reenactment
of what should have happened 61 years ago like its sister colonies in
particular and most other colonies in general. It is therefore absolutely
wrong, unfounded, and utter political nonsense to talk about “our
national independence coming from Ethiopia" whatever that might mean. Furhter, the author poses the following
rhetorical question: “What
borders did we have as of our independence in 1993?” Answer: We have
exactly the same colonial borders we have had ever since the creation of
Eritrea as established by the now well-known colonial treaties of 1900, 1902,
and 1908 that is also the unequivocal basis of The Hague mission. The author proceeds “The OAU fact finding mission
travelled to the region at the very beginning of the war and established that
Ethiopia was peacefully governing Badme, Zalambessa and several currently
disputed territories, before the war. They did so without any official
protest from the Eritrean government” This report has no
impact upon our colonial borders because regardless of the extent, nature,
and duration of whatever Eritrean Lands Ethiopia was governing peacefully or
not, with or without protest, it is not going to change our established and
well-documented colonial borders that created the very Eritrea as cited
above. Eritrea has been created as a nation state with definite colonial
borders prior to British and Ethiopian colonial occupation. The author writes “All the following mediation
efforts conducted by the UN and OAU respectively called for the return of all
military positions to the situation before war broke out, a return to the
"status quo". A return to the same situation that Eritrea was in at
independence, 1993. With Badme, Zalambessa, Burri and Alitena administered by
Ethiopia.” As we all know, and I hope the author too, the
agreement to return to status quo ante stipulates that it will not pre-judge the final
demarcation of our colonial borders. With that, no matter who administered what and for how long has no bearing on our colonial borders for these has been established even before the beginning of the Eritrean Liberation Struggle! The Hague findings will be determined in accordance with the clean and clear colonial treaties accepted by both parties. I am optimistic because I couldn’t have other option and Eritrea will prevail. “Are we really right?” Better believe it. Dr.
Mesoud Filli A. |