|
|
|
August 1, 2002 |
Brief intro
|
|
|
|
For the sake of
clarity, brevity, and to avoid redundancy, please allow the following short
introduction: |
|
Our society finds itself in a state of mutual non-recognition, which in turn can be attributed to colonialism. Various and varying colonialists abused our God given diversity to divide our people by religion, ethnicity and region true to their evil purpose of “divide and rule” to perpetuate their colonial interests unhindered and without fear of any united resistance against their colonial rule for over a hundred years, now. Unfortunately and to the surprise of the colonialists, the people of Eritrea have successfully demonstrated their will, desire and aspiration to stay and remain one nation both during our liberation struggle and recently by foiling and crashing the Woyane aggression in unison, despite and in spite of our differences. |
|
|
|
Even then, the
hundred-years old rotten culture, yes culture, of insane “mutual
non-recognition” persists and is plaguing our society in defiance of the
multi-ethnic and multi-visionary nature of our people and the inevitability
of the consequential multi-party system. And following is what president
Issayas Afeworki had to say regarding that: |
|
|
|
Adulis vol.VII No8,
October 1990, |
|
special issue,
interview with PIA. page 4. |
|
Asked about multi
party system for future free Eritrea, he answered "In a future Eritrea
different interest groups will naturally seek to persue their own interests. Their
freedom to do this can only be secure when each individual's or group's basic
political rights are guaranteed by law. Otherwise, if any individual or group
or a section of a society is allowed to be above the law and politically,
economically or culturally dominate the others there cannot be the peace and stability,
which will be a key to our progress. For these reasons a one party system
will neither enhance national security or stability nor accelerate economic
development. In fact, a one party system could be a major threat to the very
existance of our country". Please allow me to acknowledge Aida Kidane
for this excerpt from Adulis. That was for your kind information.
|
|
|
|
With all that in
mind, “mutual non-recognition” expresses itself best in the way we debate,
discuss or handle intra-Eritrean issues (From famine and natural disaster to
foreign policy and more) where they are dealt with from purely contrary
perspectives and regardless of the interest of our people and country.
Consequently, we remain divided along those lines and maintain our culture of
mutual non-recognition for we are only hearing not listening to each other
because of the lack of a medium/ambience that would allow to listen to each
other at the least and to reach consensus at best. It is this the lack of an
appropriate discussion medium that motivated the launching of this initiative
called EAR (see below for details). EAR provides a common premise on
which we can base our arguments and debate issues as we perceive them in an
amicable and friendly environment where we listen to each other at the very
least, minimize our differences when possible, and reach consensus in the
sense of mutual recognition at the most. And mutual recognition fosters,
enhances and provides the basis for mutual national actions, whenever and
wherever necessary. Case in point: The devastating natural catastrophe that
is about to hit our people and country. |
|
|
Definition and modus operandi
|
|
|
|
EAR, Eritrean Actionforum for Rapprochement, is a virtual study
forum that is activated to become a reality every time whenever any number of
Eritreans, regardless of their political views/opinions and personality,
spontaneously and/or voluntarily decide to gather in any form, at any level,
anywhere, to study and discuss the meaning and concept of rapprochement
(M’qrirab) and its applicability to resolve intra-Eritrean socio-political
contradictions in a peaceful and democratic way. |
|
EAR does not have members but voluntary
participants. |
|
EAR neither follows fixed rules nor does it
have bylaws but temporary and variable standard procedural rules that the
study forums deem necessary to conduct decent and harmonious sessions. In
other words, each study forum sets its own rules of operation. |
|
EAR sessions are free and open for all Eritreans |
|
EAR participants understand, emphasize and
accept that “rapprochement (M’qrirab)” is not merely a word meaning “getting
closer/nearer to each other” but more than that: A concept and a
socio-political philosophy with distinct provisions pertinent to the
situations in our country. |
|
EAR participants recognize and accept that
the provisions listed in the preamble/introduction in particular and the
concept of rapprochement in general shall form the common premise on
which discussions are based, for there is nothing that cannot be
resolved/achieved via the process of rapprochement. |
|
EAR participants recognize and reaffirm
that there is nothing that cannot be resolved by our constitution when
implemented. |
|
EAR participants also recognize and reaffirm that “every Eritrean is
innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt” as guaranteed by our
constitution. |
|
EAR neither collects/requires participation fees nor does it issue
ID cards, all are welcome. |
|
EAR is not some kind of political, social,
cultural or any other kind of organization but a non-partisan, secular and
unorganized/loose network of Eritreans who see rapprochement as the last and
viable resort to resolve intra-Eritrean contradictions peacefully and
democratically. |
|
EAR study forums understand that the lower
the number of participants at any given session the more safe and secure the
integrity of the study forum will be. |
|
EAR study forums understand that it is in
the best interest of their purpose to involve and utilize existing Eritrean
websites to share, communicate, and further all aspects of rapprochement,
wherever they are accepted. |
|
EAR is devoid of any kind of political binary
system, such as “for me or against me” or “us against them”. Instead, they
shall always adopt whatever they take to be the right thing to do, regardless
of politics and personalities, because no one has monopoly over what is right
and wrong. |
|
EAR participants have the option of
posting their articles in their own name, simply as “EAR- participant”, or name followed by “EAR- participant”. |
|
EAR as an auditory organ symbolizes the need
not only to hear but also to listen to each other. It also symbolizes the
purpose of the study forum: To listen to each other despite and in spite
of our socio-political and other differences. |
|
The designation “Eritrean Actionforum for Rapprochement” lends the participants a sense of sharing common identity with
people sharing common goal (rapprochement) and purpose (actions to achieve
goal). |
|
|
Objectives of
EAR
|
|
|
|
·
To cooperate with and help our
government and existing Eritrean communities, associations, and NGO’s in all
the endeavors to get our country back in its feet in whatever projects deem
necessary in general and the current/future famine and looming humanitarian
crisis in particular in the spirit and letters of rapprochement. |
|
·
To participate in the defense,
protection and preservation of the interests of our people and country over
any and every thing else, in the spirit and letters of rapprochement. |
|
·
To further and advance the purposes and
intentions of rapprochement (M’qrirab). |
|
·
To participate in defending our
country against internal or external forces aimed at undermining the
governance of our country, national security, sovereignty and unity, in the
spirit of rapprochement. |
|
·
To study, research, and debate the
concept of rapprochement and to explore, establish and share the best
possible way of taking advantage of it to resolve intra-Eritrean
contradictions peacefully and democratically. |
|
·
To enlighten and educate the Eritrean
public and ourselves about the concept of rapprochement and its applicability
in Eritrea. |
|
·
To communicate/share our findings,
agreements or disagreements between the various study forums and the public
via available Internet accesses, wherever accepted. |
|
·
To tackle, debate, and resolve
controversial intra-Eritrean issues within the context of rapprochement. |
|
·
To criticize, communicate with, and
challenge our government peacefully and democratically within the context of
rapprochement. |
|
·
To use the study forums to enhance and
foster amicable and friendly personal interactions amongst Eritreans, despite
and in spite of our declared differences. |
|
·
To research, explore and take trust
and confidence building measures between Eritreans. |
|
·
To finalize the proposal for
rapprochement to an extent that is acceptable to work with. |
|
·
To be the driving force in spreading
and implementing rapprochement (M’qrirab) within existing Eritrean
communities, associations, NGO’s and the Eritrean public at large and to contribute
to the eradication of the insane culture of “mutual non-recognition” and to
work to turn it into the sane culture of mutual recognition as a necessary
socio-political substrate of a state of peaceful co-existence, the ultimate
goal of rapprochement. |
|
·
To de-personalize rapprochement and to
turn it into a subject by and for all of us, since rapprochement pertains to
the entire people of Eritrea, whose participation is of paramount
significance. |
|
|
|
|
|
Why and how does this work? |
|
|
|
Because it is already happening and
taking place. Eritreans meet/gather in Cafes, restaurants, clubs or wherever
else where they do raise and talk about issues that matters to their people
and country only in a haphazard manner and from whatever perspectives they
hold, where rarely a minimum of consensus is reached if at all. To make such
and other similar gatherings fruitful, we need to call up the provisions of EAR, provide a
common premise, establish basic procedural rules and carry out the talks on that
basis. People will at least listen to each other, agree on some points,
disagree on others, respect each other’s views/opinions and break up in
mutual recognition. It would then be very constructive and of great service
if they would share their experiences with the public at large by posting
them, by word of mouth, or by any other means they deem necessary. |
|
|
|
|
|
You are all herewith urged, appealed
to and called upon to participate in EAR. |
|
|
|
Let us give our country a kiss of
peace and meet halfway. |
|
|
|
Yes, Rapprochement (M’qrirab)
works. |
|
|
|
|
|
EAR – participants. Contact EAR |
|
|
|
|