|
Network
of Eritreans for Constitutional
Governance
(NECG)

Eritrea
Joins The Ranks Of 'Pariah States'
28
December 2009 Editorial
The
China Post
Over
the last few years, the list of so-called "pariah states"
blamed for stirring up trouble and supporting terrorism has been
shrinking.
Following
Libya's efforts to eliminate weapons of mass destruction and cut
support for terrorist groups, major powers including the United
States and Britain lifted sanctions and trade embargoes which had
been in place for years.
Iraq
also bowed out of the "rogue state" ranks following the
toppling of Saddam Hussein and establishment of a democratic
government in the country. A similar development happened in
Afghanistan and that country has been welcomed back to the
international community. Other governments, such as North Korea, Iran
and Myanmar, are engaged in dialogue with major powers that they hope
will result in the lifting of sanctions against them.
Reducing
the number of states isolated by the international community is
beneficial to global stability and should be encouraged. But it
appears that the government of Eritrea is determined to buck this
trend, especially now that the United Nations Security Council has
imposed sanctions on the country.
Indeed,
the small nation on the Horn of Africa, which won worldwide
admiration in 1991 for winning independence from Ethiopia is now well
on its way to becoming the world's newest rogue state. This is a
regrettable development and more efforts must be made to prevent the
situation from degenerating further. But given the recent actions of
the Eritrean government, the international community has had no
choice but to impose an arms embargo and trade sanctions against the
country.
According
to the resolution passed by the United Nations Security Council,
Eritrea has regularly supplied arms and aid to al-Shabaab rebels in
Somalia who are waging a civil war against the internationally
recognized government in Mogadishu.
The
Somalian rebels, aided by Eritrea, have direct links to the al-Qaida
organization of Osama bin Laden and have constantly frustrated the
international community's efforts to stabilize Somalia, which has
lacked a functioning central government since 1991.
The
U.N.'s move against Eritrea marks a rare occasion where a government
is being punished for violating an arms embargo against another
government, in this case Somalia.
Eritrea
has constantly denied aiding the Somalian rebels and playing any role
in destabilizing the region. According to the Eritrean government,
the sanctions were drummed up by the country's arch foe, Ethiopia,
and the United States, whose aid workers were expelled from the
country in 2005.But international organizations including the United
Nations and the African Union have confirmed the sanctions-busting by
Eritrea, including shipments of guns, missiles and explosives. Under
the new sanctions, all shipments going into and out of Eritrea will
have to be inspected to make sure they do not contain arms bound for
Somalia. The country's leaders are barred from traveling outside the
country and overseas assets belonging to them will be investigated
and frozen.
Ever
since Eritrean guerillas led by the Eritrean People's Liberation
Front (EPLF) succeeded in pushing out Ethiopian troops in 1991, the
EPLF has controlled the country under a one-party state. While the
EPLF has promised to form a democratic government, the country's
ongoing tensions with Ethiopia have been used as an excuse to
repeatedly delay nationwide elections. Today, the country still lacks
a constitution and functioning judiciary system.
Besides
its conflicts with Ethiopia, Eritrea has also clashed with
neighboring Djibouti over territorial disputes and has had a rocky
relationship with Sudan.
If
the sanctions can persuade Eritrea's leaders to reach a deal with the
international community, they will achieve their intended effect.
Imposing punishment for violating the Somalia arms embargo is also an
important step in demonstrating that the United Nations will enforce
its embargoes when violated. However, a situation may emerge where
the Eritrean government chooses to ignore the rest of the world and
continue destabilizing the region.
In
addition to the sanctions, the United Nations and African Union
should work through various diplomatic channels to try and avoid a
standoff situation. Based on past experience, standoffs can last for
decades and ordinary people often suffer the most.
The
U.S.-led embargo against Cuba and the international sanctions against
Iraq after 1991 are a good example of how sanctions have failed to
achieve their intended ends. But sanctions have sometimes worked,
such as when they persuaded South Africa to abandon its apartheid
policies and enfranchise the country's black majority.
Since
international terrorism is a problem that cannot be postponed or
restricted within national borders, a way must be found to cut the
links between terrorists and the Eritrean authorities.
|