|
January 8, 2002 |
|||
|
The New World-order: Ethiopia’s nightmare, Eritrea’s
resurrection |
|||
|
By Esayas Temesgen |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Now at the eleventh hour few
hired guns in the foreign media and the nostalgic Ahmaras, [The natural menace
of Eritrea]. Are taking their last shot at Eritrea’s sovereignty lobbing and
disseminating misinformation at The Hague.
These institution embarrassment and professional perjurers, who were
talking about sixty million [militia breading theory] when it comes
to war between Eritrea and Ethiopia,
to glamour killing and distraction. and yet they talk about population
control: such as family planing ; contraception and abortion, when it comes
to feeding African kids. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
The truth of the matter is our
country with its infrastructure intact was handed over illegally to a neighboring
country which was less civilized and developed at the time. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Today, unlike the Old World
order,[the cold war] we have a complete superstructure. Our Army, Navy, Air Force the Court and
Police, i.e. The government of Eritrea [GoE] lead by our President, with Eritrean people behind him and our
flag flying at the United Nations, it
is more difficult to the court at the Hague not to be faire-minded about our
boarder. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
The pride in our past achievement,
that enabled us to face the present with its risk, to pave the way to our
future, is what motivates and guide us to accomplish our task. Unlike these
minute irrelevant; pseudo intellectuals;
Hailesselase’s foster kids, who mock our historical achievements and
future ambition. We have a present
which is a by-product of our recorded past and a resource to our future. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
The world took 50 years’ to allow
Eritrea to exhibit the ability not only to govern itself, but, also to proof
its position in the region, as equilibrium to the regions
religion and ethnic antagonism. At the inception of the Old World order, Eritrea didn’t lose its sovereignty
without a fight and raising controversy, support and acknowledgment of its
superior socioeconomic development than that of Ethiopia and Ethiopia’s lie
and deception, at the foreign desk of the UK. and the U.S. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
On January 22, 1949, Lord Jowitt.
[Lord Chancellor]argued that,
“ it was deplorable to cede any part of Eritrea to a more or less
primitive savagery.” Instead of placing it under United Nations control, we
were now proposing to hand over a further piece of territory to be
mal-administered by barbarians.” |
|||
|
|
|||
|
On the other side a diplomat like Lascelles an Ambassador of Great
Britain to Addis Ababa. Although he understood and argued about Ethiopia’s corrupt and destabilized
government to his boss Stafford, [British liaison in Eritrea] ironically was coerced by Stafford to ignore the
fact and follow a different course. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Accordingly, Lascelles argued that “Ethiopia’s acquisition
of Eritrea is crucial for the economic development and political
modernization of Ethiopia”. A union of the two countries would serve
to “accelerates this process by passing the inferior socioeconomic formation
of Ethiopia. To satisfy the need of Ethiopia’s acute need for competently
trained officials, to the contrary of Brigadier F.G [chief administrator of
Eritrea], who argued against Ethiopia’s meddling in Eritrea. Disregarding
that it is morally wrong and politically a mistake to impose economic and
social regression on Eritrea. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
The United States, in London, in
September 1945 led by Secretary of
State James F. Byrnes, at the council
of the foreign ministers of Great Britain, France and the Untied States.
[CFM], for the disposition of the Italian Colonies: Eritrea, Libya and Italian
Somalia. Before it was ill-fated. Submitted a Proposal for collective United
Nations trusteeship, to set up an administration to individual colonies, “
A UN
Trusteeship Council that would allow them to be independent after ten
years time. To assist the colonies to develop their country and with
assurance that the colonies will not be developed for any kind military
advantage to any one.” |
|||
|
|
|||
|
It was apparent that Ethiopia at
the time was prevaricating to the international community particularly to the
United State. To undermine the determined strength of Eritrea’s resistance movement and unity
against Ethiopia’s interference in Eritrea’s internal affairs. Exaggerating his
mercenaries insignificance, The so called “Unionist”. As it’s fabrication, about
his present day mercenaries, these phony intellectuals and international
bandits. The [G’s] ability to overthrow our government. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Paddock, at that time the US
representative at the UN. in his report to State department exposed Negg’s,
[the Ethiopian liaison Officer] lie about the Independent block, the active
mass organization at the time.
Paddock understood well, that
Ibrahim Sultan Ali who was lobbing at the UN, is a dedicated leader of the
independent block. As a champion of the serf movement against the Muslim
aristocrats in western Eritrea. With a solid support from Eritrean masses at
home, “is capable of convincing as many delegates as possible to obtain
majority vote in favor of Eritrea’s right to independence”. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Paddock alarmed by the determination
of Eritrean’s and their leaders, not to mention the increasing defection of
traitors the so called “Unionist” to independent block, insisted that “Negga to negotiate cabinet seats for the traitors
to keep them from defection”. [this is similar to that of the third offensive what Ethiopia’s premier
was boasting to the west, “that he has set up a government to replace the
present Eritrean government and that he will do it in seventy two hours”. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Unlike the Old World order in the
New World order These self-deception of present Ethiopia’s leaders to fold
our flag, to overthrow or kill our president, to destroy our army and soak up
our country, has became noting but a nightmare. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Awet N’Hafash |
|||
|
|
|||
|
 Esayas T. is sole bearer of the responsibility for this article |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
