Ethiopia seeks dialogue with Eritrea for the wrong reason
28 Dec 2004, Ednews – It’s been reported that both Eritrea
and Ethiopia are ready for dialogue with each other. But there is dialogue and
dialogue, as they say.
Eritrea’s overture for
dialogue can only be understood as a genuine desire to create a cordial,
amicable, and conducive ambience to facilitate the demarcation process as
determined by the Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary Commission in accordance with its
decision of 13 April 2002, provided that Ethiopia complies with Algiers
Agreement and restates its unequivocal acceptance of the border decision in
words and in deeds. That is all what the entire international community is and
has been calling for since the pronouncement of the boundary decision and that
is all there is between Eritrea and Ethiopia. And when that happens, the issue
of re-establishing of ordinary diplomatic relations with Ethiopia as it would
exist between neighboring countries based upon the established international
norms of mutual respect and recognition of each other’s territorial and
national sovereignty and non-interference in each other’s affairs would be
reduced to a mere matter of procedure and time only. That is the good purpose
and intention of Eritrea’s readiness for dialogue with Ethiopia.
On the other hand, Ethiopia,
which has adamantly refused to accept the border decision only because it did
not go its way, is seeking dialogue with Eritrea for no other reason than to
abuse it as a mechanism and a ploy to re-open the legally and conclusively settled
border dispute and re-argue it dead or until it is reversed in its favor in
flagrant violation of the Algiers peace Agreement, contrary to the call, will
and wishes of the international community, and in blatant defiance of the rule
of law in international relations.
Ethiopia has left no stone unturned
towards that effect. Lately, Ethiopia unveiled its shameless “5-point plan”
wherein it states that it accepts only 85% of the border decision and demanded
dialogue with Eritrea to renegotiate the rest in an outright in-your-face violation
of the Algiers Agreement, to say the least. To make things worst, Ethiopia dared
the world and put the international community on notice that should its plan
fail then Ethiopia will set the whole East Africa on fire. That is the ill purpose
and intention of Ethiopia’s readiness for dialogue with Eritrea: To reverse the
border decision in its favor, if not set East Africa on fire.
The only way out of this dialogue-game
is for the international community, specially the Guarantor Nations, to assume
its/their treaty obligation to ensure strict adherence to the Algiers Agreement
by whatever means is provided under UN Charter, Chapter VII even if the defiant
country is called Ethiopia. It is time to heed the recent call of UNSG Annan
that “the rule of law must be enforced, and treaties and agreements must be
implemented” lest the world as know it today ceases to be what it is. UNSG Progress
Report on Eritrea Ethiopia, 16 Dec 2004.