There is no dispute in the Horn
  
Presse Release
SC/8023
SECURITY COUNCIL EXTENDS MISSION IN ERITREA, ETHIOPIA UNTIL 15 SEPTEMBER UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTING RESOLUTION 1531 (2004) 12 Mar 20
The Daily News

The Daily News

 

 

  
    
  
   Cool Deals
  Unlimited, high
    quality internet
    service


CLICK TO GET STARTED  

_________________

 

UN calls for Ethiopiaís Unequivocal Acceptance of Ruling

 

By TED

28 Nov 2004

 

Every since the Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary Commission rendered its ruling that settled the Eritrea-Ethiopia border dispute conclusively and definitively on 13 April 2002, the world community, the UN, and the Security Council have been engaged (resolution after resolution- not less than a dozen) in fighting back Ethiopiaís incessant attempts to defy or circumvent the ruling: After baulking for 18 months, Ethiopia formally declared its defiance of the ruling by calling it unjust and illegal in a letter to the Security Council (19 Sep. 2003) and threatened war if the ruling were not reversed in its favor; and in October of 2003, Ethiopia declared the ruling of the Boundary Commission null and void, stopped demarcation forcefully, and unilaterally dismantled the Boundary Commission sending it into oblivion to this date. By prior mutual agreement, the ruling of the Boundary Commission is final, binding, and with no right to appeal or recourse.

 

Undeterred by and despite and in spite of Ethiopiaís reckless actions, the UN/UNSC continues to firmly standby and support the Boundary Commission and its decision and the Algiers Agreement. To this effect and this year alone, the Security Council passed two resolutions calling for the same thing: Ethiopiaís Unequivocal Acceptance of Boundary Commissionís decision.

On 12 March 2004: Expressing its concern about Ethiopiaís rejectionof significant parts of the Boundary Commissionís decision, and its current lack of cooperation with the Boundary Commission, the Security Council passed resolution 1531 (2004) calling, inter alia, for the unequivocal restating of Ethiopiaís acceptance of the Boundary Commissionís decision [Security Council resolution 1531 (2004) 12 March 2004 The situation between Eritrea and Ethiopia]

 

On 14 September 2004: Again expressingits concern about Ethiopiaís ongoing rejection of significant parts of the Boundary Commissionís decision, and its current lack of cooperation[cooperation means for Ethiopia to do what is asked or required of it by the Boundary Commission] with the Boundary Commission and Reaffirming all its previous resolutions and statements pertaining to the situation betweenEthiopia and Eritrea, and the requirements contained therein, includinginparticular resolutions 1531 (2004) of 12 March 2004, the SecurityCouncil passed resolution 1560 (2004) urging, inter alia, Ethiopia to show the political will to reaffirm unequivocally its acceptance of the Boundary ommissionís decision, and take the necessary steps to enable the Commission to demarcate the border without further delay [Security Council resolution 1560 (2004)14 September 2004 The situation between Eritrea and Ethiopia]

 

The UNís repeated call for Ethiopiaís Unequivocal Acceptance of the Boundary Commissionís decision is neither arbitrary nor being imposed upon Ethiopia. It is dictated by the nature of the Decision: It cannot be reargued, reopened, renegotiated, no wheeling and dealing, no more talks, the case is closed and must and can only be accepted as decided and determined-unequivocally. That is how Eritrea and Ethiopia wanted it to be.

 

Thus, unless the world as we know it today ceases to exist, the UN has no other option but uphold the nature of the decision and call for Ethiopiaís unequivocal acceptance of Boundary Commissionís decision, a call that stands even as we speak. And unless the Algiers Agreement has been declared null and void and the Security Council reverses itself only because the ruling didnít go Ethiopiaís way, it wonít be long before we write the post mortem of Ethiopiaís recent ďacceptance in principleĒ ploy, which calls for more talks, give and takes simply because it constitutes flagrant violation of the sanctity of a legal ruling ofan international court, the Algiers agreement, and defies UNSC resolutions 1531and 1560.Here, what is at stake is the sanctity of binding international agreement, rule of law in international relations, integrity of international arbitration/court, and international law.

 

Ethiopia is the only country in the globe that is contending and contesting the decision of the Boundary Commission and the ball remains in Ethiopiaís court until it declares unequivocal acceptance of the border ruling and lets the Commission do its job or until the world as we know it today cease to exist and the UN/UNSC reverses itself.

 

The ball has no business in Eritreaís court because Eritrea is not contending or debating any thing. Eritrea has been, is and remains in compliance with the decision without any condition and unequivocally.

__________________________________________

 

 
  
Google